June 1, 2008

911 Truth: Remote Controlled Aircraft

http://fyi6.com

This ain't no movie trailer - the police state technocracy has surpassed the vision of Orwell's pervasive spy system.

Duration : 0:7:19


Filed under Remote Controlled Airplanes by admin

Permalink Print Comment

Comments on 911 Truth: Remote Controlled Aircraft »

November 30, 1999

redletterchurch @ 12:00 am

How about, "either …
How about, "either you're with those who support the Constitution (rather than simply 'us' which could mean NWO) or you're with the terrorists?" The Constitution (like the Teachings of Jesus) is easy to live with…unless you are corrupt…

stopglobalswarming @ 12:00 am

How Ironic: an army …
How Ironic: an army with no country….The US army has abandoned white people.

LeftSkidLow @ 12:00 am

Don't worry too …
Don't worry too much about it, its basically a scwheizer 330 with some computers in it, no scout pilot could ever be replaced by a computer. There are too many decisions based on what a pilot sees and his experience, that a computer could ever simulate, it won't be nearly as effective as an experienced scout pilot. Most shows on the discovery channel are like this, saying such and such product is the best ever (ie. the apache) which isn't that great in current warfare.

007savak @ 12:00 am

Read the Bible …
Read the Bible Revelation 2.8 and then find a Quran in English and go to Chapter 5 verses 67 to 70. Fox News and Sky News is owned by a Zionist That clams to be Jewish but he is the same kind of Jew that is spoken about in the Bible - Revelation 2.8 both Christan's and Muslims Believe the same things but your Zionist Owned Media wont tell you this they wont tell you that Muslims believe Jesus will come back at the end of time just ask your self's Y.

orangefu @ 12:00 am

I don't agree with …
I don't agree with your analysis of structural integrity of the World Trade Towers 1 and 2 - nor your exclusion of Building 7. These buildings did not have the same design, and yet they were not brought down by fire. I agree with you regarding the senselessness for the "the us to attack themselves". They didn't attack themselves. An insurance-scam involving arson? The person doesn't burn themselves. Hitler's order to burn the 'Capitol' building of Germany? He didn't burn himself.

timg455 @ 12:00 am

My post I repoied …
My post I repoied to bopn seems to have gone missing and I am sorry but I don't know what if it was and who they were could you please specify because I am confued.

sexboywonder @ 12:00 am

Truw, but if it WAS …
Truw, but if it WAS, and they Were, then how would you KNOW Tim? Dont you think it would be sorta stupid to come out with ur hands up before you are done with the act? The pool of evidence and suspect is so vast and rich, letting it play out on its own is criminal

bopn @ 12:00 am

1st I did not write …
1st I did not write an essay, nor did I suggest that you write one. You do not seem to have understood the significance of 911 in terms of justifying a projection of US global power. Afghanistan Iraq, possibly Lebanon are all examples of this power projection. The "catastrophic and catalyzing" event of 911 has been the justification for all of the wars since. your last point: WTC7 defies all conventions on a collapse due to fire. LOOK IT UP- the third skyscraper. Then come back. Peace

timg455 @ 12:00 am

I am sorry I didn't …
I am sorry I didn't know this was an essay posting area, if you want facts and me to prove my point sorry I am not going to write an essay. But I will say there is little of a point for the us to attack themselves or to blow the building up. If you understood anything about the wtc's structure you would see how it fell so easily and is the only skyscraper to have fallen due to fire.

bopn @ 12:00 am

bad analogy– you …
bad analogy– you have nothing to gain from kicking me in the head except a beat down from me. Secondly your assertion that it was not a conspiracy is based on: "it just doesnt add up" this is a worthless point based on 0 facts and 100% opinion. Peace

timg455 @ 12:00 am

These drones are …
These drones are neat but don't seem practical in many areas maybe only useful in reconaissance. With this particular drone I don't see the improvement over the predator plane which has been used in Iraq for some time and it will stay airborne much longer, will being able to be equipped with anti-tank hellfire missiles.

timg455 @ 12:00 am

True but its …
True but its possible for me to come kick you in the head but that doesn't mean I will. And I believe there is something the U.S. is whitholding about 9/11 but they keep many information from us and it just doesnt add up for it to have been a major conspiracy.

WhyNotTruth @ 12:00 am

Wow, so this …
Wow, so this technology was well know to the military on 9/11/01. The expert manuverability is alot more understandable with this technology in place.

raybloke @ 12:00 am

excellent video.
excellent video.

bopn @ 12:00 am

Great video …
Great video Orangefu. Digging it the whole way through.

bopn @ 12:00 am

Anyone who thinks …
Anyone who thinks that Arabs flew planes into WTC/Pentagon had better realise that it was possible to fly planes into those buildings without requiring any humans at all.

Leave a Comment