September 9, 2008

UAVs vs. RC Airplanes

with an awesome question that we're not sure how to define. When does a Remote Control Airplane become a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, and then subject to the scrutiny that UAVs go through before being allowed to fly in any part of the NAS?

Filed under Remote Controlled Airplanes by admin

Permalink Print Comment

Comments on UAVs vs. RC Airplanes »

September 9, 2008

RAH-66 Comanche: Aerial Reaper @ 6:52 pm

RAH-66 Comanche: A stealth helicopter. Should UAVs really replace it?
The RAH-66 Comanche stealth Scout/Reconisence Attack helicopter is being replace with unmaned aerial vehicles. Should the world most powerful helicopter be replaced even before it gets put out by these little military grade RC airplane toys?
I did hear of the British using a full squadron of the Comanche though. And a marine friend of mine said the marines use them. Any of these statements true?

Harry @ 11:54 pm

The Comanche program was discontinued before ever making it into service. The Army will instead focus on updating it's current fleet of aging helicopters. The role of armed scout will fall onto the AH-64 Apache and Bell ARH-70, which is due to replace the Vietnam-vintage OH-58 Kiowa.

*edit* Wingless Pilot is correct, The RAH-66 never got out of the evaluation phase, and no units (in the U.S. or abroad) fly the Comanche.
References :

Honza_Urban @ 11:56 pm

Commanche was not actually the world's most powerfull helicopter. the UAVs do their job cheaper, faster, and do not require the CSAR support when they are eventually shot down. they are simply replaced.

more than that the Commanche still was intented to be just a high priority target killer - low priority target designator for apache. It was never intented to be a surveillance unit like most the UAVs are.
as for the designed UAV scouts to cooperate with the Apaches- once again they are far more cheaper and do not require manning.

no brits are not using them ,nor are the Marines. –speaking of Commanches.
References :

Wingless Pilot @ 11:58 pm

UAVs are more cost effective and their pilots can fly from the safety of a control room at DoD or wherever it is they safely fly from. I'm not even sure the Comanche made it thru all its testings/certifications.

Remember Lockheed's SR-71 Blackbird? It got replace by spy satellites which don't need to carry expensive pilots to fly or burn fuel every second to remain in orbit.
References :

Leave a Comment